新皇冠体育app

Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael Beer, Ioannis A. Kougioumtzoglou, Edoardo Patelli, Ivan Siu-Kui Au

Novel Bio-Inspired Sensor Network for Condition Assessment

  • Simon LaflammeEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_88-1
  • 1.8k Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

Condition assessment of civil structures is a task dedicated to forecasting future structural performances based on current states and past performances and events. The concept of condition assessment is often integrated within a closed-loop decision, where structural conditions can be adapted based on system prognosis. Figure 1illustrates a particular way to conduct condition assessment. In the process, various structural states are measured, which may include excitations (e.g., wind, vehicles) and responses (e.g., strain, acceleration). These measurements are processed to extract indicators (e.g., maximum strain, fundamental frequencies) of current structural performance. These indicators are stored in a database, and also used within a forecast model (e.g., time-dependent reliability,...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abouhnik A, Albarbar A (2012) Wind turbine blades condition assessment based on vibration measurements and the level of an empirically decomposed feature. Energy Conversion and Management 64(2012):606–613
  2. Dilena M, DellOste M, Morassi A (2011) Detecting cracks in pipes filled with fluid from changes in natural frequencies. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(8):3186–3197
  3. Farrar C, Lieven N (2007) Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365:623–632
  4. Frangopol D, Kallen M, Noortwijk J (2004) Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: review and future directions. Prog Struct Eng Mater 6(4):197–212
  5. Gangopadhyay R, De A (2000) Conducting polymer nanocomposites: a brief overview. Chem Mater 12(3):608–622
  6. Gao L, Thostenson E, Zhang Z, Byun J, Chou T (2010) Damage monitoring in fiber-reinforced composites under fatigue loading using carbon nanotube networks. Philos Mag 90(31–32):4085–4099
  7. Giurgiutiu V (2009) Piezoelectricity principles and materials. In: Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring. Wiley, pp 981–991
  8. Glaser R, Caccese V, Shahinpoor M (2012) Shape monitoring of a beam structure from measured strain or curvature. Exp Mech 52(6):591–606
  9. Jardine A, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1483–1510
  10. Jones R, Bellemore D, Berko T, Sirkis J, Davis M, Putnam M, Friebele E, Kersey A (1999) Determination of cantilever plate shapes using wavelength division multiplexed fiber bragg grating sensors and a least-squares strain-fitting algorithm. Smart Mater Struct 7(2):178
  11. Kollosche M, Stoyanov H, Laflamme S, Kofod G (2011) Strongly enhanced sensitivity in elastic capacitive strain sensors. J Mater Chem 21:8292–8294
  12. Laflamme S, Kollosche M, Connor J, Kofod G (2012) Soft capacitive sensor for structural health monitoring of large-scale systems. Struct Control Health Monitor 19.1 (2012):70–81
  13. Laflamme S, Kollosche M, Kollipara VD, Saleem HS, Kofod G (2012) Large-scale surface strain gauge for health monitoring of civil structures. In: SPIE smart structures and materials/nondestructive evaluation and health monitoring. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 83471P-83471P
  14. Laflamme S, Saleem HS, Vasan BK, Geiger RL, Chen D, Kessler MR, Rajan K (2013a) Soft elastomeric capacitor network for strain sensing over large surfaces. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech
  15. Laflamme S, Kollosche M, Connor J, Kofod G (2013b) Robust flexible capacitive surface sensor for structural health monitoring applications. ASCE J Eng Mech 139(7):879–885
  16. Loh K, Hou T, Lynch J, Kotov N (2009) Carbon nanotube sensing skins for spatial strain and impact damage identification. J Nondestruct Eval 28(1):9–25
  17. Materazzi A, Ubertini F, D’Alessandro A (2013) Carbon nanotube cement-based transducers for dynamic sensing of strain. Cem Concr Compos 37:2–11
  18. Osada Y, De Rossi DE (2000) Polymer sensors and actuators. Springer, Germany
  19. Perera R, Ruiz A (2008) A multistage fe updating procedure for damage identification in large-scale structures based on multiobjective evolutionary optimization. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(4):970–991
  20. Savadkoohi A, Molinari M, Bursi O, Friswell M (2011) Finite element model updating of a semi-rigid moment resisting structure. Struct Control Health Monit 18(2):149–168
  21. Shirakawa H, Louis EJ, MacDiarmid AG, Chiang CK, Heeger AJ (1977) Synthesis of electrically conducting organic polymers: halogen derivatives of polyacetylene, (CH) x. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 16:578–580
  22. Tata U, Deshmukh S, Chiao J, Carter R, Huang H (2009) Bio-inspired sensor skins for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 18:104026
  23. Teughels A, De Roeck G (2004) Structural damage identification of the highway bridge Zz24 by FE model updating. J Sound Vib 278(3):589–610
  24. Wilkinson A, Clemens M, Harding V (2004) The effects of sebs-g-maleic anhydride reaction on the morphology and properties of polypropylene/PA6/sebs ternary blends. Polymer 45(15):5239–5249

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Room #416AIowa State UniversityAmesUSA